Establish the workload context
Bring forward estate facts, platform relationships, dependencies, business criticality, and known change constraints.
JOURNEY 02 · MODERNIZE
Give every workload a 7R treatment, and show why it earned it.
Aurithm connects application context to infrastructure evidence, target constraints, dependencies, and change appetite so teams can review the recommended treatment, viable alternatives, and missing evidence.
PRODUCT PROOF
See the working surface, not a conceptual mock-up.
HOW THE DECISION MOVES
Evidence stays connected from intake through review.
Test the viable treatments
Evaluate 7R candidates using governed rules instead of forcing every workload into a cloud-first answer.
Expose the rationale
Show the evidence, constraints, and disqualifiers behind the recommendation and its alternatives.
Prioritise the portfolio
Rank work by defensible signal and identify the workloads that require deeper discovery or specialist review.
INPUTS
What Aurithm needs
Workload inventory and application context
Dependencies, business criticality, technical constraints
Target-platform options and modernisation appetite
Customer-confirmed exclusions and specialist findings
OUTPUTS
What the review team receives
Per-workload 7R recommendation
Rationale, alternatives, constraints, and evidence references
Portfolio ranking and deeper-discovery queue
Inputs for transformation roadmap and solution design
EXPLICIT BOUNDARY
What this page is, and is not, claiming.
A 7R recommendation is decision support, not an autonomous code-modernisation commitment. Application teams and authorised architects retain ownership of the final treatment and delivery plan.
AURITHM WORKING SESSION
Bring the infrastructure decision that is blocking progress.
We will map the evidence path, the decisions Aurithm can support, the review outputs required, and the specialist validations that remain.
Plan the session